Cerebral Palsy Lawsuit Lawyer

Medical School Scholarship - Cerebral Palsy Lawyer

Waechter Medical-Legal Scholarship

 

2013 Scholarship Entries Listed Below

 

 ______________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

2013 Medical Scholarship Winner - Margaret Connolly

 

A graduate from Boston College with a degree in Economics. She is currently a second year student at Tufts University School of Medicine.

 

Doctors, like lawyers, are very specialized individuals. We finish medical shcool and techinaclly earn our MDs but then go on to contniue training as residents, follwoed by fuhtrer spceiailzation thruogh fellwoships. By the time we are finllay settled in prcatice, we hvae all had at laest 30 years of edcuation, if not mroe. Raeding this now, 30 years sonuds like a remarkable number. However, we go thorugh tihs trianing with ohter phycisians, freinds and collaegues who consider a few yaers of intenral medicine trianing “short.” We froget how specailized we are, talking to paitents in foerign terms abuot fasciculations and edema instead of muscle twitching and swelling.

 

Working with lawyers, we are put in the paitent’s position. The wrods our laywers comfortably use are unfmailiar and intimidating, often maening as little to us as a daignosis of Wernicke’s aphasia means to our paitents, maening to us as little as this essay once you reliaze the oredr of the lettres is compeletly jmubled.

           So if I could make one request to lawyers, it would be to remain cognizant of the remarkable amount of education and training you have. Just as our patients appreciate both our medical skill and our efforts to explain diagnoses and treatments in common terms, we are grateful for both your diligence and your patience.

 

 ______________________________________________________________________ 

 

2013 Legal Scholarship Winner - Skylar Simons

 

A graduate from University of Texas at Austin with a degree in English and two minors in Advertising and African American Studies. She is currently a second year student at Baylor Law School.

 

 

Based on John Bunyan's 1678 Christian novel Pilgrim's Progress, where the names and places of the work are symbolic for more.

 

In a land not so far away called Inbetween, Law met Med and they fell in love. Law was passionate and cunning, a talker of tales, while Med was full of logic and reason, a healer of man. Their courtly romance was fueled by Justice and Concern. Together they battled Malice and Greed and Neglect.  As lovers of mankind, they understood that Right and Fair did not always win in their land of Inbetween, but that did not deter their dreams. Beyond the edicts of man and dictates of society, they relished in the faery power of their love. When the two became one, they had Hope. Hope was loved by the Tired, the Weary, the Forgotten, and the Defeated. Now in the land of Inbetween Hope lives on because two united. 

 

 ______________________________________________________________________  

 

2013 Runner-Up Entries

 

Which Profession is More Noble? Legal or Medical?

By Dustin Bullara

 

My name is Dustin Bullara and I am in my 2nd year of college as a Pre Law student. My brother, Robert Bullara who is a Pre Med student (1st year) and I have had several discussions about which profession is perhaps the more noble of the two.

I happen to believe that Law is the more noble profession because many people fall victim to the insurmountable cases of malpractice here in our country.  Back in the day when my grandparents were children, doctors were viewed as Gods.  The contrary is now true in 2013. 

Please don’t get me wrong; there are many great doctors here in the United States and throughout the entire world. They are helping an overwhelming amount of people, however, there are several that our legal profession will encounter that do not deserve to have hospital privileges no less perform surgery. Unfortunately, we as lawyers (Well, a future lawyer for me) must stand up for our clients and protect their best interest. Everyone is entitled to seek legal advice and we, as lawyers must be ready to go into battle with our clients to protect their rights.


The medical doctors will hide behind large insurance companies with financial caps in which our clients are only entitled to no matter how large the gross and punitive damages are.  It is our job to find loopholes and ways around the insurance companies that serve the doctor’s best interest as they try to hang on to their millions and not be held accountable for our client’s misfortunes at the hands of their doctor’s malpractice.  That’s just wrong and that is why I am going to become the Best lawyer that I can become so that I can protect the rights of the unborn, their parents and anyone else that needs my help.



Medical Essay

By Kayla Kucharek

Any person can make a medical mistake. It could be something as simple as over sharing patient information to someone else or a more serious mistake such as operating on the wrong patient. To avoid these mistakes requires all health care professionals to recheck their work, sometimes multiple times, and to be alert to what they are actually doing. A story comes to mind of the case Josie King that we watched in our nursing class. It is an unfortunate case of negligence. A child was burned at home and brought into the hospital for treatment. The child received inappropriate amount of pain medication and her signs of dehydration went unnoticed by any of the faculty. The result ended tragically with her death. It is our job to keep our patients safe and well cared for; therefore weall need to do our part to ensure this doesn’t happen.



Medicine and Law

By Justin Walzl


The professional fields of medicine and law are both extensive and filled with many years of evolution and change.  Law and medical practice used today, may be printed in text and used for generations to come, or it could be washed away by fresh new ideas within a year.  Both professions are held to very high standards, yet there is an unwritten constant brother-to-sister or cat-to-dog battle of who is more correct about issues that involve a certain common element: people.  Both professions focus on people to achieve the very best for them.  Whether the person is a client or a patient, the goal is clear to try to do what is right for that person.  So, why is it that we (medicine and law) trip over each other and create tension between the professions?  Law uses
current social/government rules and guidelines as well as decisions over the history of time to determine right from wrong.  Medicine uses current research and technology as well as information collected over that same amount of time to determine a proper course of patient care.  Almost like riding bicycles on
parallel roads.  We can wave to each other, and we are going in the same direction.  We are going towards the same end point, but for some reason our “parallel roads” seem to swerve; hence breaking the rules of geometry and causing conflict and a sense of not liking the other profession due to interpretations that we are not going towards the same goal.  Well, in the words from Commander Riker on Star Trek, “We don’t have to like each other to work well together!”  But who ever truly said that we do not like one another?  This brings to the point of how we can work more easily together.  Education.  Both professions have mountains of education.  But a motto that I use when I teach students is: Never forget where you came from!!  Physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants at one point in their lives never knew where the spleen was and what CPR really meant.  Lawyers and paralegals at one point never knew the details of criminal versus civil and certainly had no idea who Marbury or Madison were.  So, all healthcare/medicine professionals have to become lawyers and vice versa.  No, that will not work.  But it does spark a thought.  Part of clinical practice for both fields should involve a rotation in the other profession.  It was a management tool utilized in industry for years as well as a common cliché called “Walk a mile in my shoes”.  Each educational curriculum should make room for a six week rotation in shoes with the other profession. True hands on clinical education for medical professionals to see the personal side of a client who is suffering (when surgery and pills will not help) and is in need of legal assistance to move and gain justice.  As well, clinical education for lawyers to see a patient who is not a textbook case, is not clear cut, and despite top knowledge care, may have a hospital course guided by a best-guess technique because that is all that is available.  For those out of the classroom already, continuing education is a powerful and required element for both professions that can give a bare minimum foundation of this concept and review case files
to bring to light, the areas that seem to be shadowed in the present day.  While this concept may meet with initial resistance, would it not be better for our client/patient if we were riding a tandem bike
down the same road, talking to each other along the way, aimed towards the same goal.  That is the medical professional and lawyer team that I want to care for and represent me. 



How to Reduce Medical Mistakes

By Joe Rivet


Sadly, medical mistakes happen every day in our country despite having the best medicine and technology in the world. Patients place their care in the hands of medical professionals never thinking of the unfortunate and often preventable medical mistakes.


The medical industry has more recently created a push for quality and outcomes; however, health plans and physician compensation models seem to contradict quality and outcomes. Healthcare is a business and just like any other business, they want to make money. In order for cash flow to be positive salaries need to be in check, compensation models reward high productive providers, hospitals strongly negotiate with payers for the best rates, payers closely watch medical spends creating policies to limit high cost procedures. The patient becomes lost in all of this. They are the consumer with no voice and often suffer in the end by not being allowed to receive the right diagnostic services they need, or able to use a drug off-label for a proven result, or denied a hospital stay because they don’t meet criteria. As a result the healthcare industry has created a ripe environment for adverse events.


While not all medical mistakes stem from our countries reimbursement model, it seems highly probable that provider compensation and payer reimbursement rules are strong contributors to medical mistakes. Providers should be given a salary with a quality bonus at the end of each year if they have had no medical mistakes or any known adverse events. This would put providers back into the context of practicing medicine and truly focused on the patient’s care and outcome. This would likely mean seeing fewer patients in a day, yet providing quality care for each patient seen. The provider could spend more time with the patient, engaging them in their care and document the services within a reasonable time after the encounter. The ripple effect would result in patient access issues; however, could be solved by adding more providers to a group or facility.


To offset the decrease of cash flow health plans should compensate more for providers who routinely have good outcomes and practice true quality medicine. Health plans should be more accountable when services are denied or not authorized and should only be denied on science rather than cost, payment, or contract terms.


Most providers are not ill- intended; most went into medicine to care for patients. As business leaders and new or current lawyers, politicians, and health plans, should place themselves in the role of a patient when decisions are made. Do the decisions make sense and impact quality? An environment should be created to help provides continue to practice good and safe medicine to minimize mistakes. Removing the business aspect form their shoulders would be an impactful place to start.

 

 

Medical- Essay

By Cole Gross


I believe there is an unseen tension between the medical field and the judicial system. It appears that individuals in the medical field feel pressure from lawyers when everyone in today’s society is not hesitant to sue. With this statement, those in the medical field need to have a sociological perspective and try to understand that lawyers are simply doing their job.  Suing for medical accidents is among the top, if not the top, reasons for bringing a civil suit to court. Both sides need to understand each other before the tension between these two fields can be eliminated.


   One possible solution could be to set parameters around the amounts of money awarded to the victim. I believe there should be a cap in financial compensation. There needs to be a reasonable and agreeable number that both sides can accept. If we set these caps, I believe this will ease the hostility. The biggest part of the tension is the fact that the medical field can lose a substantial amount of its money so quickly. Therefore, if there is a cap, that will satisfy the medical field and the lawyers can continue doing their jobs.

 

 

Essay

By Kylee Deterding

 

When we, a healthcare system comprised of human beings, begin to assign equal value to every individual: patient, caregiver, nurse, doctor, administrator, it leads to respect. Respect to quality, quality to engagement, engagement to fewer errors.


Healthcare is far reaching in its influence and industry. The arms of healthcare are rich with skillful, altruistic, intelligent individuals that have been disempowered to a point of ‘punching in the time clock.’


This is witnessed throughout the system, where professionals are being scrutinized to a point of disengagement.  This is a systemic illness affecting every individual, down to patients. We all deserve more than mindless workers.


Implementing respect at every level employs a basic premise that all people are valuable. With that idea in the forefront it makes possible to trust those that care. Reduction of medical mistakes warrants a significant paradigm shift. The concept: ‘when we are valued, we will value others’.

 

 

What Doctors Don’t Know About Law, But Should: Tax Law

By Corinna Cicmanec

 

Benjamin Franklin once said, “In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” But for something so certain, it is surprising how little doctors, and most of the population, know of this area of law; rather, tax law is viewed as a forbidden territory, where only the very bravest enter.

Fortunately, there are tax attorneys who study the Internal Revenue Code, where tax laws are codified, and where the IRS looks to for guidance. Here is a short list of what doctors should know about tax law:

• Tax law is not about evading taxes. It is about using planning techniques that are
permissible to their fullest capabilities, and often combining techniques to create a
completely legal tax structure. These structures can range from a simple, in-state
business entity, to spanning over the country, or even internationally.

• Careful tax planning can shield assets in the event of malpractice, using completely
legal tax structures that are worth spending money on.

• Start your estate planning now. There is a specific amount of money that can be
given yearly in order to avoid gift tax, and even estate tax upon death.

• Obamacare has been ruled constitutional as a tax. In the coming years, it will be
possible to see tax attorneys working on Obamacare requirements within
businesses. This is especially important for doctors who are also employers,
because of the requirements of the legislation.

• The Physician Financial Transparency Reports (Sunshine Act) will require
reporting of certain interests held by physicians and their families. The Sunshine
Act will be another factor to be taken into consideration during tax business plan

Doctors should make sure to take into consideration tax law during both a personal and
business plan, and consult a tax attorney to make sure every advantageous planning
technique is being utilized.

 

How to Reduce Medical Mistakes in Hospitals
By Brian James Like


Medical mistakes are no rare circumstance.  They happen everyday, all around the world, and this is no secret.  Let’s think about all of the steps that hospitals take in order to reduce mistakes.  Electronic wristbands, checklist protocols, employees double-checking and supervising each other are common practices to ensure mistakes are made infrequently.  These measures are already being practiced and do actively prevent mistakes – but to further reduce the incidence rate, we need to improve patient education, and patients need to take charge of their conditions.

This is a two-pronged approach.  When treated for a condition in a hospital, a patient is told what is going to be done to them.  But it is not always the case that the specifics of the drugs that will be administered are conveyed.  Specifics matter.  If a patient is supposed to receive a medication on a regular schedule in the hospital, they need to be informed of that medication, the times it will be administered, and the reason for it.  It needs to be formally printed out so that a patient can easily follow along.

With this knowledge, a patient can now be vigilant in observing that their medications are delivered on time and correctly.  This requires the patient to be responsible for their own health, as they should be.  The patient can be one additional checkpoint to ensure that they receive the right medications at the right time for the right reason.

There is no reason that a stay in the hospital should be a passive process.  While the sick and injured are at a hospital, patients who are physically capable of monitoring their situation and care should be charged with this responsibility, provided they are given the right resources.

Medical Essay

By Sarmistha Banerjee

 

A doctor and an attorney can combine their expertise and provide multi-dimensional assistance to the most needy populations through a medical-legal partnership. The interconnection between health complications and socio-environmental causes is especially apparent among low-income or poor persons, whose illness is often symptomatic of an external cause over which they have little control. A doctor could be treating a patient’s asthma; but what if the asthma is caused by the patient’s moldy apartment? The doctor can treat the symptom but the underlying issue requires an attorney negotiating a solution with the landlord and advising the patient/client of his rights as a tenant. The Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) study and researchers like Bruce McEwan and Michael Meaney are finding that medical and socio-environmental problems often have common roots, some of which can be solved by attorneys. One effective response is medical-legal partnership clinics for vulnerable populations such as the homeless, the elderly and the working poor. These clinics are excellent training grounds for attorneys, and every law school should establish one in conjunction with a medical practice. Senior law students would train medical staff to identify external factors requiring legal remedy. Patients would respond to a short questionnaire about their environment, such as living and work conditions. If certain factors were identified (drafty apartments, long work hours in hot rooms without enough water breaks), they would be referred to the legal clinic. Such a partnership creates real communication across medical and legal lines. It can also be a life-changing experience for attorneys-in-training, and can direct them into public service for their entire career.

 

How to Reduce Medical Mistakes

By Ashleigh Durden

Meet Fred. He is an intelligent doctor who has been in his practice for over 30 years. He has saved lives that other doctors would have considered "un-fixable". Fred is a superhero to his community. The people in the community kiss the ground he walks on and bow down whenever they see him. When spoken of, the community acknowledges him as "Your Majesty". One day, a man was rushed into his office and didn't know what was happening to him! Dr. Fred seemed to be clueless on his condition. Not wanting to announce his first medical mystery patient, he treated him with high amounts of prescription medicine. This man later died after putting his trust in the local "Superhero". Dr. Fred would have never killed this man if he would not have been so confident in himself and unwilling to contact another professional about the man's situation. It never hurts to double check with other skilled doctors in uncertain conditions.


When we, a healthcare system comprised of human beings, begin to assign equal value to every individual: patient, caregiver, nurse, doctor, administrator, it leads to respect. Respect to quality, quality to engagement, engagement to fewer errors.
Healthcare is far reaching in its influence and industry. The arms of healthcare are rich with skillful, altruistic, intelligent individuals that have been disempowered to a point of ‘punching in the time clock.’
This is witnessed throughout the system, where professionals are being scrutinized to a point of disengagement.  This is a systemic illness affecting every individual, down to patients. We all deserve more than mindless workers.
Implementing respect at every level employs a basic premise that all people are valuable. With that idea in the forefront it makes possible to trust those that care. Reduction of medical mistakes warrants a significant paradigm shift. The concept: ‘when we are valued, we will value others’.
When we, a healthcare system comprised of human beings, begin to assign equal value to every individual: patient, caregiver, nurse, doctor, administrator, it leads to respect. Respect to quality, quality to engagement, engagement to fewer errors.
Healthcare is far reaching in its influence and industry. The arms of healthcare are rich with skillful, altruistic, intelligent individuals that have been disempowered to a point of ‘punching in the time clock.’
This is witnessed throughout the system, where professionals are being scrutinized to a point of disengagement.  This is a systemic illness affecting every individual, down to patients. We all deserve more than mindless workers.
Implementing respect at every level employs a basic premise that all people are valuable. With that idea in the forefront it makes possible to trust those that care. Reduction of medical mistakes warrants a significant paradigm shift. The concept: ‘when we are valued, we will value others’.

 

 ______________________________________________________________________ 

Launch our birth injury Special Investigation Unit

call to see if medical negligence caused the injury.

1-800-708-5433

 

 

 

 

 

Waechter Medical-Legal Scholarship: Official Rules

SPONSOR: Jason Waechter (hereinafter: “Sponsor”) 

1. ELIGIBILITY: Waechter Medical-Legal Scholarship is open only to those legal residents of the fifty (50) United States and the District of Columbia who are seventeen (17) years of age or older at the time of application and who are currently enrolled in an accredited institution of higher learning (college, university or trade school). Current employees, officers, directors and agents of Sponsor and its related companies and members of their immediate families (defined as spouse, parents, siblings and children) and persons residing at the same address are not eligible to win. Void where prohibited. 

2. HOW TO ENTER: Write at least 150 original words about any of the following:
How the Medical & Legal Community can work more easily together;
How to reduce medical mistakes;
For medical students only: What lawyers don’t know about medicine, but should.
For law students only: What doctors don’t know about law, but should.
Any other novel topic mixing law and medicine.
In this writing also include (which does not count toward your 150 words):
Name & contact information;
Your background of not more than 40 words (include school and how far you are along).
Submit any text electronically to clerk@lawyerforlife.com  Anything else that cannot be submitted electronically (or anything else [creative] you wish to send) can be mailed to:  Waechter Law, 19080 W. Ten Mile Rd, Southfield MI 48075
 All Applications and writings become the property of the Sponsor and will not be returned. All Applications and writings will, if applicable, be posted and used in Sponsor’s websites and promotional materials.  By submitting an Application, you fully and unconditionally accept and agree to this.
Sponsor assumes no responsibility for lost, late, misdirected, or unintelligible entries. By submitting an Application, you fully and unconditionally accept and agree to these Official Rules and the decisions of the Sponsor, which are final and binding.


3. SELECTION OF POTENTIAL WINNERS: Jason Waechter shall pick the winners based on creativity and potential need.  The potential winners will be notified by e-mail, at which time he/she will be required to sign further documentation as explained below. Sponsor shall have no liability for any potential winner notification that is lost, intercepted or not received by the potential winner for any reason. Sponsor reserves the right to choose Prize Recipient if, in its sole discretion, it does not receive a sufficient number of eligible and qualified Applications. Portions of the Prize Winning Application may be posted on the Sponsor’s Websites, or used in other marketing materials, without compensation or notice to the winner.

4. PRIZES: Winners will receive a Scholarship Prize in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). The Scholarship Prize will be in the form of a check made payable to the accredited institution of higher education attended by the Scholarship Prize Recipient. Winner may be paid directly given special circumstances.  Scholarship Prize may not be assigned, transferred, or changed, except at the sole discretion of Sponsor. No cash equivalent prize will be awarded. The awarding of any Scholarship Prize is contingent upon full compliance with these Official Rules. Applicants agree to be bound by Official Rules and agree that if any Scholarship Prize Recipient fails to provide proof of identity, refuses to complete and provide any requested tax forms (including IRS W-9 form), is found to have violated the Official Rules or otherwise does not meet eligibility criteria, Scholarship Prize will be forfeited and another applicant will be chosen as the winner. Applicants understand that Sponsor is not liable for injuries, losses or damages of any kind arising from participation in this Scholarship Program and acceptance, possession and use of Scholarship Prize. Sponsor is not responsible for any typographical or other error in the printing of the offer, administration of the Scholarship Program or in the announcement of the Scholarship Prize. Taxes on prizes are sole responsibility of Scholarship Prize Recipients. Scholarship Prize Recipients will be issued 1099 tax forms. 


5. PUBLICITY: Except where prohibited, by accepting a Scholarship Prize, the Scholarship Prize Recipients agree that Sponsor may, without any limitation or further compensation or notice, use his or her name, voice and/or likeness in any and all media, worldwide, for the purpose of advertising and promoting the Website, the Sponsor, the Scholarship Program, or any other promotion, contest or sweepstakes sponsored by Jason Waechter. 

6. OWNERSHIP: By submitting an Application, you acknowledge and agree that: (a) Sponsor will own your Application, including your written response submission, and (b) as between you and Sponsor, Sponsor will own all publishing rights in and to the Application and the written response submission. Each Applicant hereby irrevocably grants, transfers, sells, assigns and conveys to the Sponsor, its successors and assigns, all present and future right, title and interest of every kind and nature whatsoever, including, without limitation, all copyrights, and all rights incidental, subsidiary, ancillary or allied thereto (including, without limitation, all derivative rights) in and to the Application and the written response submission(s) for exploitation throughout the universe, in perpetuity, by means of any and all media and devices whether now known or hereafter devised (the “Rights”). Sponsor shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to edit, composite, morph, scan, duplicate, or alter, the Application and written response submission(s) for any purpose which Sponsor deems necessary or desirable, and each Applicant irrevocably waives any and all so-called moral rights they may have in the Application and written response submission(s) submitted by him or her. Each Applicant hereby acknowledges that such Applicant does not reserve any rights in and to the Application and the written response submissions. 

7. DISPUTE RESOLUTION: Except where prohibited, by participating, Applicant agrees that all issues and questions concerning the construction, validity, interpretation and enforceability of these Official Rules, or the rights and obligations of participants and Sponsor and their agents shall be governed by and construed exclusively in accordance with the laws of the State of Michigan without giving effect to any principles of conflicts of law of any jurisdiction. Applicant agrees that any action at law or in equity arising out of or relating to this Scholarship Program, or awarding of the prizes, shall be filed only in the state or federal courts located in the State of Michigan and Applicant hereby consents and submits to the personal jurisdiction of such courts for the purposes of litigating any such action. Except where prohibited, by participating in this Scholarship Program, Applicant agrees that: (a) any and all disputes, claims, and causes of action arising out of or connected with this Scholarship Program, or awarding of the Scholarship Prizes, shall be resolved individually, without resort to any form of class action; and (b) any and all claims, judgments and awards shall be limited to actual out-of-pocket costs incurred, including costs associated with participating in this Scholarship Program but in no event attorneys’ fees; and (c) under no circumstances will any participant be permitted to obtain awards for and hereby waives all rights to claim punitive, incidental and consequential damages and any other damages, other than for actual out-of-pocket expenses, and any and all rights to have damages multiplied or otherwise increased. Some jurisdictions do not allow the limitations or exclusion of liability for incidental or consequential damages, so the above may not apply to you. 

8. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES/INDEMNIFICATION. Each person who enters this Scholarship Program represents and warrants to Sponsor as follows: (i) the Application, including the written response submission is the Applicant’s own original, previously unpublished, and previously unproduced work; (ii) the written response submission is wholly original with Applicant and as of the date of submission, is not the subject of any actual or threatened litigation or claim; (iii) the written response submission neither infringes upon nor violates the intellectual property rights or other rights of any other person or entity; (iv) the written response submission does not and will not violate any applicable laws, and meets the Submission Requirements set forth above. Each Applicant hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the Sponsor harmless from and against any and all third party claims, actions or proceedings of any kind and from any and all damages, liabilities, costs and expenses relating to or arising out of any breach or alleged breach of any of the warranties, representations or agreements of Applicant hereunder.

9. FURTHER DOCUMENTATION: Except where prohibited, potential Scholarship Prize Recipients (or their parents or legal guardians if they are minors at the time of application) will be required to complete and return an Affidavit of Eligibility, Publicity/Liability Release, and Copyright Assignment within ten (10) days of notification.


10. NO OBLIGATION TO USE. Sponsor shall have no obligation (express or implied) to use any winning Application, or to otherwise exploit a winning Application or continue the development, production, distribution or exploitation thereof, and Sponsor may at any time abandon the use of the winning Application for any reason, with or without legal justification or excuse, and the Scholarship Prize Recipients shall not be entitled to any damages or other relief by reason thereof. 

11. IMPORTANT. PLEASE READ - GENERAL RELEASE AND LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY. By entering the Scholarship Program, each Applicant acknowledges and agrees that the Sponsor, its related companies, websites, affiliates, and each such company’s respective employees, officers, directors and agents are not responsible for any costs, injuries, losses, or damages of any kind arising from or in connection with: (i) incomplete, lost, late, misdirected or illegible entries or for failure to receive Applications due to any cause, including without limitation human, transmission, or technical problems, failures, or malfunctions of any kind, whether originating with sender, or otherwise, that may limit an Applicant’s ability to participate in the Scholarship Program; or (ii) any injury or damage resulting, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, from participation in the Scholarship Program and/or the use of any prize, including, without limitation, claims, costs, injuries, losses and damages related to personal injuries, death, damage to, loss or destruction of property, or any claims, costs, injuries, losses, or damages related to or based on the Applicant’s rights of publicity or privacy, or the Applicant’s claim that he or she has somehow been defamed or portrayed in a false light. Sponsor assumes no responsibility for any damage to an Applicant’s computer system which is occasioned by accessing the Website or participating in the Scholarship Program, or for any computer system, phone line, hardware, software or program malfunctions, or other errors, failures, delayed computer transmissions or network connections that are human or technical in nature, or for the incorrect or inaccurate capture of information, or the failure to capture any information. This scholarship program is subject to all U. S. federal, state and local laws and regulations. Void where prohibited. 

12. SPONSOR’S RIGHT TO MODIFY, SUSPEND OR TERMINATE. In the event Sponsor is prevented from continuing with the Scholarship Program by any event beyond its reasonable control, then Sponsor shall have the right in its sole discretion to modify, suspend, or terminate the Scholarship Program. 

13. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Sponsor reserves the right in its sole discretion to disqualify any individual who is found to be tampering with the application process or the operation of the Scholarship Program or the Website, to be acting in violation of these Official Rules, to be submitting responses dishonestly or inaccurately, or to be acting in an unsportsmanlike or disruptive manner. In the event of a dispute as to the identity of any entrant, the authorized account holder of the email address used to enter will be deemed to be the entrant. The “authorized account holder” is the natural person assigned an email address by an Internet access provider, online service provider or other organization responsible for assigning email addresses for the domain associated with the submitted address. If an Application is confirmed by Sponsor to have been erroneously deleted, lost or destroyed, the entrant’s sole remedy shall be another Application, if time permits. Sponsor’s failure to enforce any term of these Official Rules shall not constitute a waiver of that or of any other provision. 

14. LIST OF SCHOLARSHIP PRIZE RECIPIENTS: The names of the Scholarship Prize Recipients of this Scholarship Program will be posted on the Sponsor’s website(s). It will be published here: www.birthlaw.com

15. SPONSOR: The Scholarship Program is sponsored by Attorney Jason Waechter, Law Offices of Jason Waechter.